WebApr 17, 2012 · I am trying to read two integers, stored consecutively, from a memory block (i have a pointer void *block pointing to the contents of the block) using memcpy. The first one is read just fine using: memcpy (&test, block, sizeof (int)); I try to read the second using: memcpy (&test, block + sizeof (int), sizeof (int)); (Of course i am having ... WebMar 12, 2013 · you can use memcpy as, memcpy(&req_byte, (buf+4), 1); this will copy fifth byte of your message to req_byte. you can vary number after (+) in source buffer to …
c - failure scenarios for memcpy - Stack Overflow
WebOct 11, 2024 · When you refer to the address of a pointer, this normally means the pointer's own location in memory, not the value it holds (which also is an address). – Andreas Wenzel Oct 11, 2024 at 4:55 1 @N001: If you follow the advice I gave in my first comment, does your program then work as intended? Both printed pointer values are the same, then. WebJun 24, 2015 · no, it's like *ptr = value;. memcpy takes the address of both source and destination. value must have type char * and ptr have type char ** (although you could … ion 3 amp ice auger
how to implement overlap-checking memcpy in C - Stack Overflow
WebFeb 29, 2016 · You can just cast the char* to an int* and work with that seeing as you know you always have a valid 8-byte region to write to. char *data; … WebMar 12, 2016 · As Paul Ogilvie correctly explained, memcpy deals with user space addresses. As such they are virtual addresses, not necessarily physical addresses. Yet there is a possibility for very large areas with very specific alignment characteristics to optimize memcpy by requesting the OS to remap some of the destination virtual … WebSo the answer is no; the check is not necessary (or yes; you can pass zero). Share Improve this answer Follow edited Sep 22, 2012 at 10:42 answered Sep 20, 2010 at 13:32 Mike Seymour 248k 28 442 637 1 Would a pointer be considered "valid" for purposes of such a function if it pointed to the location following the last element of an array? i-on40h+